1 |
Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2013, 18:16:32 schrieb Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn: |
2 |
> Mike Frysinger schrieb: |
3 |
> > On Sunday 20 January 2013 10:54:55 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
4 |
> >> Yes, I mentioned this in another post already. We can use EAPI=1 IUSE |
5 |
> >> defaults instead. But this will not change any systems so I fail to |
6 |
> >> see the point behind this. This will only move clutter from profiles |
7 |
> >> into ebuilds. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > where it should have been in the first place. if it's a package-specific |
10 |
> > issue, then it belongs in the package. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> It is a common issue shared among all packages and package versions that |
13 |
> have this flag. So I think the profile is the correct place. |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
Following the discussion here, I've come to the conclusion that I made a bad |
17 |
call w/r to removing dri from default/linux after learning more about its |
18 |
effect. Summarizing, USE=dri |
19 |
* is the recommended default anytime |
20 |
* is needed in particular also in the embedded case (about as far from desktop |
21 |
as possible) |
22 |
|
23 |
Discussion here and on #g-dev presented two options, either |
24 |
* enabling dri in all relevant ebuilds as default-on, or |
25 |
* re-adding it to the profile. |
26 |
|
27 |
Chí-Thanh, who is the maintainer of the relevant packages, prefers a central |
28 |
setting. We've talked about this once more on IRC, I've reverted the profile |
29 |
commit and USE=dri is again enabled in default/linux/make.defaults. |
30 |
|
31 |
[We can still migrate to IUSE="+dri" in the ebuilds over time but that is a |
32 |
separate issue.] |
33 |
|
34 |
I am sorry for any inconvenience this has caused. |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
|
38 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
39 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
40 |
dilfridge@g.o |
41 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |