Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?)
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 14:42:30
Message-Id: 46059ce10511270639sd5540d9l75c6391082597cde@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?) by "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
1 On 11/27/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <flameeyes@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Sunday 27 November 2005 00:10, Luca Barbato wrote:
3 > > It's great!
4 > > Make it a FEATURE default on for common profiles.
5 > +1, and it would be better if the FEATURES, instead of removing the generated
6 > files, would disable the building of them completely, mainly because "work"
7 > systems with limited CPU, RAM and HDD space would probably prefer not having
8 > to create and store them :)
9
10 Err, maybe I am incorrect, but isn't it more "work" to ungenerate them
11 (using strip) then to just not install them?
12 >
13 > /me thinks of laptops
14 >
15 > --
16 > Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
17 > Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
18 >
19 >
20 >
21
22 --
23 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?) "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?) Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?) Edward Catmur <ed@×××××××××.uk>