Archives
Archives
| From: | foser <foser@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem | ||
| Date: | Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:34:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1087990491.9412.4.camel@rivendell | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem by Jason Huebel |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 20:07 -0500, Jason Huebel wrote: |
| 2 | > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 | > Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > On Tuesday 22 June 2004 04:54 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 6 | > > Option 2: |
| 7 | > > STABLE="yes" |
| 8 | > > STABLE="no" |
| 9 | > > This is pretty straightforward, so I won't go in depth here. |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > Damn, Donnie beat me to this. I prefer this over all the other solutions |
| 12 | > presented. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Read my other reply to where you say the same thing : it's duplication |
| 15 | of info. Duplication is bad. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | - foser |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem | Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem | Jason Huebel <jhuebel@g.o> |