Archives
Archives
| From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing policy about -Werror | ||
| Date: | Wed, 12 Sep 2018 23:52:21 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEdQ38FBnSz-zdUw+iiysFX5qjRj6sxY7nMEQHh+qzJeqHdMug@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing policy about -Werror by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 4:03 PM Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Now, I could buy that -Werror turns NEW warnings into fatal errors, |
| 3 | > due to the use of a newer toolchain, since upstream probably didn't |
| 4 | > test with that toolchain and thus wouldn't have seen the warning. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Yes, exactly. This is one of the major things people have said repeatedly. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Werror makes moving gcc forward much more difficult. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing policy about -Werror | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |