Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing policy about -Werror
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:11:33
Message-Id: CAGfcS_naAd3qShZf1mgjH_b-PBv1n=Q9asXrEaatvHx4fgk6ig@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing policy about -Werror by Matt Turner
1 On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:52 PM Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 4:03 PM Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
4 > > Now, I could buy that -Werror turns NEW warnings into fatal errors,
5 > > due to the use of a newer toolchain, since upstream probably didn't
6 > > test with that toolchain and thus wouldn't have seen the warning.
7 >
8 > Yes, exactly. This is one of the major things people have said repeatedly.
9 >
10 > Werror makes moving gcc forward much more difficult.
11 >
12
13 Sure, but wouldn't a block on newer versions of gcc cause similar headaches?
14
15 --
16 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing policy about -Werror Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>