| 1 |
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:29:50 -0700 |
| 2 |
Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 16/08/2012 13:19, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> > eutils.eclass | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I would say "no", and let's queue this for the next EAPI. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> The reason being we have everything ${foo}into {new,do}${foo}, |
| 10 |
> provided by EAPI and utils as well, why should foo=ins be different |
| 11 |
> now? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I'd be happy to see that in a new EAPI but please note that a lot |
| 14 |
of eclasses inlines that thing right now. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
We can remove it from eutils when it gets into EAPI (i.e. make |
| 17 |
conditional to older EAPIs). This will keep things both usable |
| 18 |
and clean. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Best regards, |
| 22 |
Michał Górny |
Archives