Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils 1/2] Add dointo && newinto.
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 20:48:28
Message-Id: 502D5BFE.60204@flameeyes.eu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils 1/2] Add dointo && newinto. by "Michał Górny"
1 On 16/08/2012 13:45, Michał Górny wrote:
2 >
3 > We can remove it from eutils when it gets into EAPI (i.e. make
4 > conditional to older EAPIs). This will keep things both usable
5 > and clean.
6
7 I still don't like it — I definitely don't like changing the approach
8 midway and halfway.
9
10 So my 2 cents here keep saying "no".
11
12 --
13 Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
14 flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils 1/2] Add dointo && newinto. "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>