| 1 |
Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 16:25 +0100, Max Zettlmeißl wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 14:15, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> |
| 5 |
>> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> > If no one intends to join, we should drop the following to |
| 7 |
>> > maintainer- |
| 8 |
>> > needed: |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> I use some of those packets daily. Is there a way to join the |
| 11 |
>> Common |
| 12 |
>> Lisp project without currently having maintainer status or is |
| 13 |
>> that not |
| 14 |
>> intended? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I don't think you can join the project, but you could still be |
| 17 |
> added as |
| 18 |
> an additional proxy maintainer for those packages you care |
| 19 |
> about. That |
| 20 |
> would let you take care of them using pull requests once |
| 21 |
> everyone is |
| 22 |
> made aware that common-lisp@ isn't going to respond to RFCs. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
At the risk of over-committing myself (I'm stretched a bit thin |
| 25 |
myself), |
| 26 |
I'm willing to be in the Common Lisp project as long as Max does |
| 27 |
the |
| 28 |
heavy lifting. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I've recently taken interest in getting Nyxt in tree and it |
| 31 |
depends on SBCL and a few other in-tree Lisp packages. However, |
| 32 |
I'm not strong on Lisp environment, and will gladly yield to |
| 33 |
anyone better suited. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
WKR, |
| 36 |
Aaron |
Archives