| 1 |
On Fri, 04 May 2007 15:36:51 -0400 |
| 2 |
Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> The point of policy is *not* to impede progress. It is supposed to be |
| 4 |
> to provide our users the best quality distribution. If policy gets in |
| 5 |
> the way of progress without gain for our users, then the policy needs |
| 6 |
> to be revisited. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
And the point of enforcing policy and escalating problems is to prevent |
| 9 |
rogue developers from breaking stable, screwing over users' systems and |
| 10 |
then repeatedly refusing to show any sign that they've learned from |
| 11 |
that and lots of other mistakes. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives