| 1 |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On Tuesday 03 January 2006 04:30, Luis F. Araujo wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>Now if i change to >=app-text/xpdf-3.01-r4 , it works just fine. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>But you significantly change its meaning. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>>I am not sure what it is happening here though... is the !< notation |
| 14 |
>>broken? |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>Portage does not resolve block correctly, look at bugzilla there are tons of |
| 18 |
>bugs open. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
So i suppose we should avoid using this kind of notation whenever possible. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
>>I also think we should stick to the >= notation instead, which it is |
| 25 |
>>cleaner imho. |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>It does not mean the same, it would require adding a dep that is not actually |
| 29 |
>there. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
Which dep? |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives