Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal for changes for the next EAPI version
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 08:19:05
Message-Id: pan$7d583$752c824b$2848c134$164d2857@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for changes for the next EAPI version by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh posted on Tue, 17 May 2016 12:29:36 +0100 as excerpted:
2
3 > On Tue, 17 May 2016 07:26:03 -0400 Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>
4 > wrote:
5 >> We already have "emerge --config" which is expected to be run after the
6 >> install process has completed, so I don't think that this is too much
7 >> of a stretch. Maybe call the phase "pkg_test" analogous to "pkg_config"
8 >> and in contrast to "src_test" which runs within the working directory.
9 >> Then "emerge --test" could run it.
10 >
11 > For various technical reasons to do with the spec and package manglers
12 > sometimes using phase function names with the src_ or pkg_ stripped off,
13 > calling it that would be a huge pain.
14
15 What about something like gentoo_test, or more generically, distro_test?
16
17 That would also emphasize the difference between distro-level
18 functionality and integration testing (which if I'm reading correctly is
19 the proposal here) and upstream-level testing, via src_test.
20
21 --
22 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
23 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
24 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman