| 1 |
On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:47:27 -0700 |
| 2 |
Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Well, I meant that this should be doable without the maintainer's |
| 5 |
> consent. Meaning, I ask you to stabilize 1.0-r1 and a few weeks |
| 6 |
> later, you can decide to stabilize -r2 without me having to file a |
| 7 |
> bug. Basically, the maintainer decides the minimal revision he wants |
| 8 |
> to go stable (so bugs are fixed, etc) but the revisions after that |
| 9 |
> are up to the arch teams, unless the maintainer sees a need for |
| 10 |
> everyone to update (major bug, security). My main goal here is to |
| 11 |
> reduce the "we have to wait on the maintainer to ask" issue within a |
| 12 |
> given version of a package. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Well, that's probably ok when the higher revision is just a "fixed" |
| 15 |
version, but if for example it includes new (invasive) patches or other |
| 16 |
major changes to the ebuild it's a different story. But I'd hope we can |
| 17 |
rely on common sense here. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Marius |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives