| 1 |
Troy Dack wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 2004-04-03 at 16:44, Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>Someone posted an article[1] about optimizing distcc a few days ago on -user. It talked |
| 5 |
>>about using unsermake[2] instead of automake to generate Makefiles that let many source |
| 6 |
>>files be built at once, which allows you to take full advantage of a network full of |
| 7 |
>>distcc hosts. Did any of the devs take a look at it? It appears to only be available |
| 8 |
>>through KDE CVS, but that's never stopped any of you before :) |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>>[1] http://www.csh.rit.edu/slashdot/distcc.html |
| 11 |
>>[2] http://www.kde.me.uk/index.php?page=unsermake |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I did attempt to hack the kde-cvs eclass to use unsermake, it didn't |
| 15 |
> work too badly, the only problem was that every time you built a kde-cvs |
| 16 |
> based package the unsermake dir would be re-fetched. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I suppose it wouldn't be too hard to create a standalone unsermake |
| 19 |
> ebuild, however unsermake was a little unreliable last time I tried it. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
It can be used on non-KDE packages, right? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Andrew Gaffney |
| 25 |
Network Administrator |
| 26 |
Skyline Aeronautics, LLC. |
| 27 |
636-357-1548 |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives