| 1 |
The current plans are to remove 'inject' altogether... Changing it to continue |
| 2 |
to have the same (or at least similar) effect is better than that. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Saturday 04 September 2004 12:18 am, William Kenworthy wrote: |
| 5 |
> Can you describe how changing the inject function will improve portage |
| 6 |
> use - seems a real step backward from a user point of view. For an |
| 7 |
> example of the problems this type of change causes check out the many |
| 8 |
> posts on package.keywords - complicated matters for users. As well I |
| 9 |
> have two systems that work fine, and one that ignores anything in |
| 10 |
> package.mask! |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Are we going down the path of complicating gentoo and reaping mandrake |
| 13 |
> like rewards (an overcomplicated, fragile management system for the |
| 14 |
> distro) by doing so? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> BillK |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 01:50, Luke-Jr wrote: |
| 19 |
> > On Friday 03 September 2004 5:46 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 20 |
> > > On Friday 03 September 2004 10:55 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 21 |
> > > > Well, inject should never be used as a matter of course, so I don't |
| 22 |
> > > > think this is a reasonable objection really... |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> -- |
| 25 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Luke-Jr |
| 29 |
Developer, Utopios |
| 30 |
http://utopios.org/ |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives