| 1 |
On 03/09/2012 09:48 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 |
> El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 16:57 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: |
| 3 |
>> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:02:23 +0100 |
| 4 |
>> Pacho Ramos<pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:56 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 7 |
>>>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:51 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 8 |
>>>>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 9 |
>>>>>> Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like |
| 10 |
>>>>>> herds are empty. If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think |
| 11 |
>>>>>> we should drop that herds and move their packages to |
| 12 |
>>>>>> maintainer-needed in a week or so. |
| 13 |
>>>>>> |
| 14 |
>>>>>> What do you think? |
| 15 |
>>>>>> |
| 16 |
>>>>> |
| 17 |
>>>>> The same applies to "sgml" now that cryos is retiring :( |
| 18 |
>>>> |
| 19 |
>>>> and text-markup, I think it's the last empty herd now |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>>> Maybe we could do the same as did in the past for openoffice herd: |
| 22 |
>>> - Change metadatas and bugs to assign them to maintainer-needed (and |
| 23 |
>>> reflect reality) |
| 24 |
>>> - Keep herd in metadatas and CCed them to bug reports |
| 25 |
>>> |
| 26 |
>>> The other option would be to simply drop that herds, assign packages |
| 27 |
>>> to maintainer-needed and wait developers to grab whatever they want |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> For net-zope, I'd prefer dropping it. We decided to get rid of Zope, |
| 30 |
>> removed almost all relevant packages, so there's no point in keeping |
| 31 |
>> the herd. |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> OK but, what about the rest? ;) |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Please leave at least media-optical@ be as it is. Changing it doesn't |
| 37 |
make any sense. |
Archives