| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 5 |
| See the part that I said "make sense to take out". What you described is |
| 6 |
| a perfect example of something that needs to stay. All I'm getting at is |
| 7 |
| that minor things that the package maintainer thinks isn't important to |
| 8 |
| keep in the active changelog, should be able to be removed. I'm not |
| 9 |
| implying to blindly remove changelog entries solely based on the fact |
| 10 |
| that those ebuilds are in the attic. Common sense would play here. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
This is a nice idea in theory, but that means maintainers will have to |
| 13 |
sit around reading the whole ChangeLog and editing it. That directly |
| 14 |
takes away from real development time, for how much benefit? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
The tradeoff isn't worth it to me. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Thanks, |
| 19 |
Donnie |
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iD8DBQFDuguVXVaO67S1rtsRAsiBAKD0aLpFFyDmv26vLbEA9Hh4X8UGGgCg6GIT |
| 24 |
EPVU6pfW2IiFPDNGrtJX45g= |
| 25 |
=zVFO |
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives