| 1 |
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:25:34 +0100 Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:51:25AM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
| > There is currently no explanation as to why this GLEP should be |
| 5 |
| > chosen over ChrisWhite's 42. I will add such a section if anyone |
| 6 |
| > requests it. |
| 7 |
| Any reason why you chose bashing Chris' GLEP in another mail and start |
| 8 |
| your own instead of working together and bringing your input for 42? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Yup. I already had most of my GLEP written, and I don't see anything in |
| 11 |
ChrisWhite's list of vagueness worth using. Besides, there's nothing |
| 12 |
wrong with multiple competing GLEPs on an issue. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
| I miss references to the old log ewarn issue, which really should be |
| 15 |
| solved as well while we're at it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Separate concern. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
| There are some good ideas in your GLEP, so are some in Chris'. No good |
| 20 |
| is coming from having two similar GLEPs around at the same |
| 21 |
| time. So please don't waste our time [1] by having two more or less |
| 22 |
| redundant GLEPs discussed. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
It's my view that ChrisWhite's GLEP is a complete waste of space, given |
| 25 |
that it doesn't contain an actual proposal. I see no point in using it. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) |
| 29 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 30 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives