Archives
Archives
| From: | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] devleopment sources are no longer 'development' - example | ||
| Date: | Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:41:38 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1093459671.31841.71.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] devleopment sources are no longer 'development' - example by Greg KH |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 14:22, Greg KH wrote: |
| 2 | > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 02:03:51PM -0400, Travis Tilley wrote: |
| 3 | > > here's an example of how his creates confusion, where on amd64 our |
| 4 | > > stable kernel is named development-sources. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > I agree it's a pain. Hopefully this can be fixed someday soon with |
| 7 | > slots. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Is there any way to restrict by slot? To say, keep an ebuild with a |
| 10 | SLOT >= x from installing? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Chris Gianelloni |
| 14 | Release Engineering - Operations/QA Manager |
| 15 | Games - Developer |
| 16 | Gentoo Linux |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Is your power animal a penguin? |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] devleopment sources are no longer 'development' - example | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> |