| 1 |
On 24/02/14 19:48, Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) wrote: |
| 2 |
> This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been |
| 3 |
> integrated into systemd!In case someone still wants to retain his |
| 4 |
> original systemd INSTALL_MASK, just use udev ebuilds from poly-c |
| 5 |
> overlay. These ebuilds |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> - still install udevd into /sbin where a daemon belongs to. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
no, it doesn't. it's an executable that should be ran within the init |
| 10 |
script only, and has no business in living in $PATH. the only reason we |
| 11 |
still |
| 12 |
had it in /sbin, was me sturbornly avoiding /lib/systemd directory since |
| 13 |
the systemd-udevd would have been the only file there, which is |
| 14 |
no longer the case. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> - disable the crappy new network naming scheme by default |
| 17 |
> - install the new naming scheme config files into /lib/udev/network/ |
| 18 |
> (version >=209) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
stupid, since upstream assured me, systemd-udevd won't be the only |
| 21 |
package reading the file from it's intended location |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> - try to prevent most naming pollution of pure udev with systemd crap. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
childish. me don't like pink ponies. pink too much. pony okay. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> I have no plans to stop fixing the annoyances the gentoo udev ebuilds |
| 29 |
> have since udev was integrated into systemd in the ebuilds from my |
| 30 |
> overlay. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
as you wish, /me passes the `find . -exec sed -i -e 's:systemd::g' {} +` |
| 33 |
beer can opener :) |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- |
| 37 |
> Von: Mike Gilbert |
| 38 |
> Datum:24.02.2014 16:55 (GMT+01:00) |
| 39 |
> An: Gentoo Dev |
| 40 |
> Betreff: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D. <whissi@××××××.de> wrote: |
| 43 |
> > Hi, |
| 44 |
> > |
| 45 |
> > not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't have |
| 46 |
> > "/lib/systemd/" (INSTALL_MASK). |
| 47 |
> > |
| 48 |
> > The current news item draft raises question like "When the 'actual |
| 49 |
> > configuration' is in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link... what will |
| 50 |
> > happen to people without systemd (and a INSTALL_MASK set)?" |
| 51 |
> > |
| 52 |
> > Would be nice if the news item and Wiki could handle upgrade path for |
| 53 |
> > systemd *and* non-systemd users... |
| 54 |
> > |
| 55 |
> |
| 56 |
> You need to remove /lib/systemd/ from INSTALL_MASK. If you don't want |
| 57 |
> unit files, mask /lib/systemd/system/ instead. |
| 58 |
> |
Archives