| 1 |
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> What I dont actually understand at all is why bumping the EAPI should be so |
| 3 |
> complicated or involved that it even deserves so much resistance... |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
<rant>Ok, it REALLY annoys me when people pull out this kind of a line |
| 6 |
in an argument... If it isn't all that complicated or involved and it |
| 7 |
just makes so much sense, then why do we bother to waste time asking |
| 8 |
for it to be made policy, since obviously everybody will just do it |
| 9 |
anyway... |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Believe it or not, people who take up an opposing side in a debate |
| 12 |
don't ALWAYS do it because they're simply dumber than you. That is, |
| 13 |
unless they're arguing with me... :) </rant> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> As an additional bonus this keeps your memory fresh about all the great new |
| 17 |
> features... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Yes, but keeping around all those old EAPIs keeps your memory fresh |
| 20 |
about how those ones work. As an additional bonus, you don't have to |
| 21 |
bother to figure out how the new ones work unless you actually need a |
| 22 |
feature offered by them. :) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Rich |
Archives