| 1 |
Kevin F. Quinn napsal(a): |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:23:55 +0000 |
| 3 |
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> If a RESTRICT value is questionable, it shouldn't be supported or |
| 6 |
>> used. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I agree; it'd be useful to know exactly what is failing the sandbox and |
| 10 |
> why, with the aim of fixing sandbox if it isn't quite up to the job. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
+1; RESTRICT=sandbox shouldn't exist. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
If you want to write an ebuild for some commercial broken stuff that |
| 15 |
doesn't work w/ sandbox and stick it into some overlay, then stick |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
if has sandbox ${FEATURES} ; then |
| 18 |
eerror "This thing is FUBAR with sandbox" |
| 19 |
die "If you really want to install it, disable sandbox manually" |
| 20 |
fi |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
into pkg_setup and be done with it; no need for RESTRICT=sandbox or |
| 23 |
ACCEPT_RESTRICT. Users can decide whether they really wish to install |
| 24 |
such app and disable sandbox temporarily if they think it's a good idea. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
If you'd like to commit this to the official tree, then either fix it |
| 27 |
properly or don't commit such stuff at all. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Best regards, |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Jakub Moc |
| 34 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 35 |
GPG signature: |
| 36 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 37 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives