Archives
Archives
| From: | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | Justin <jlec@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel | ||
| Date: | Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:03:27 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4BCED4C6.7010304@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel by Justin |
||
| 1 | On 04/14/2010 08:46 AM, Justin wrote: |
| 2 | > There is at least one other example which benefits from singlular build, |
| 3 | > atlas libs. They run a benchmark suite to create platform specific |
| 4 | > headers, which is heavily influenced by the system load. So having |
| 5 | > RESTRICT=parallel would make the emerge more reliable. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I wonder if that case shouldn't be handled better with an huge ewarn so |
| 8 | people concerned would really run it in a benchmark environment, alone. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | lu |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Luca Barbato |
| 15 | Gentoo/linux |
| 16 | http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] RESTRICT=parallel for builds that can't be executed in parallel | Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de> |