| 1 |
On 10/28/2016 06:53 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 10/27/2016 06:13 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>> So yes, it would probably be enough to put such a simple statement |
| 6 |
>>> somewhere. The problem is: where? ;-) GLEP seemed like a |
| 7 |
>>> straightforward solution to make it global. |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Could it be relevant on the git workflow page? I consult that on a |
| 11 |
>> regular basis (it's even in my watch list), and accepting/pushing |
| 12 |
>> contributions seems like it's right in line with our expected git workflow. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I think that the git workflow page is probably a good place to |
| 16 |
> consolidate developer-focused (or serious-contributor-focused) |
| 17 |
> information. I don't think it is a great place to point outside |
| 18 |
> contributors. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> An external contribution has a few parts: |
| 21 |
> 1. External contributor submits contribution. |
| 22 |
> 2. Somebody makes sure it is good. |
| 23 |
> 3. The contribution makes it into a repository official branch. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Part 3 and possibly part 2 might belong on that git workflow page. I |
| 26 |
> think part 1 really needs to be on a "how to contribute" page that is |
| 27 |
> really focused on outsiders. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Of course, having an overall git workflow that is inclusive of both |
| 30 |
> internal and external contributions where it comes to the actual |
| 31 |
> Gentoo dev doing the commits seems like a good idea. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
+1 |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer |
| 37 |
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
| 38 |
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |
Archives