Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuild bumping policy wrt KEYWORDS
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:53:56
Message-Id: 1093532540.2653.37.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuild bumping policy wrt KEYWORDS by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 10:44, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:16:10 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
3 > <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote:
4 > | So for Sparc, I should just KEYWORD away (on non-critical packages)
5 > | and hope nothing breaks?
6 >
7 > No no no no no.
8 >
9 > Don't add a ~sparc keyword to a package which previously had no (~)sparc
10 > keywords at all.
11
12 I meant when bumping a package that already had a sparc or ~sparc
13 KEYWORD.
14
15 > Don't move things from ~sparc to sparc.
16
17 I wouldn't touch this, but I guess it does need to be said.
18
19 =]
20
21 > *** ---> DO NOT EVER ADD A ~SPARC KEYWORD TO ANY NEW *PACKAGE* UNLESS
22 > YOU'VE ACTUALLY TESTED IT YOURSELF. <--- *** (Oh, and if you *have*
23 > tested it and you're not on the sparc@ alias, make sure we know what
24 > you're doing...)
25
26 I haven't started doing anything yet, but I'll be sure one of you guys
27 knows before I touch anything.
28
29 --
30 Chris Gianelloni
31 Release Engineering - Operations/QA Manager
32 Games - Developer
33 Gentoo Linux
34
35 Is your power animal a penguin?

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature