| 1 |
9.1.2006, 17:28:04, Andrea Barisani wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> 9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> >> |
| 10 |
>> >> Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag? |
| 11 |
>> >> If so should it be a 'no*certs' flag or a USE=cacerts ? |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> > USE=cacerts sounds the proper course of action to me. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> NOT until use-based deps are in place, plzktnxbye!!! Don't break the damned |
| 16 |
>> realplayer thing again. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> It's the realplayer thing that should be fixed. Can't believe that |
| 19 |
> ca-certificates got relatively quiet as a PDEPEND because of that ;). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
No, it's not, it's FETCHCOMMAND/wget thing. Would like to hear about |
| 22 |
alternatives besides those discussed ad nauseam in Bug 101457. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Realplayer does *not* depend on ca-certificates in ANY way, it's |
| 25 |
FETCHCOMMAND that's broken w/ unknown CA and self-signed certificates. Since |
| 26 |
not honoring self-signed certificates by default can be hardly considered as |
| 27 |
a bug, hence the depenency on ca-certificates in wget. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Best regards, |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Jakub Moc |
| 33 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 34 |
GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 35 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives