| 1 |
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> 9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag? |
| 9 |
> >> If so should it be a 'no*certs' flag or a USE=cacerts ? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> > USE=cacerts sounds the proper course of action to me. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> NOT until use-based deps are in place, plzktnxbye!!! Don't break the damned |
| 14 |
> realplayer thing again. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
It's the realplayer thing that should be fixed. Can't believe that |
| 17 |
ca-certificates got relatively quiet as a PDEPEND because of that ;). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Andrea Barisani <lcars@g.o> .*. |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Developer V |
| 22 |
( ) |
| 23 |
PGP-Key 0x864C9B9E http://dev.gentoo.org/~lcars/pubkey.asc ( ) |
| 24 |
0A76 074A 02CD E989 CE7F AC3F DA47 578E 864C 9B9E ^^_^^ |
| 25 |
"Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives