| 1 |
9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag? |
| 7 |
>> If so should it be a 'no*certs' flag or a USE=cacerts ? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> USE=cacerts sounds the proper course of action to me. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
NOT until use-based deps are in place, plzktnxbye!!! Don't break the damned |
| 12 |
realplayer thing again. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Best regards, |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Jakub Moc |
| 18 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 19 |
GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 20 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives