1 |
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:55 +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote: |
3 |
> > Regarding the inclusion of ca-certificates as a PDEPEND (yeah a brief |
4 |
> > exchange of emails already happened on -dev but since it's not so easy to |
5 |
> > track it I'm lagging behind on this) I would like to express that I really |
6 |
> > don't like the fact that we are "trusting" cacert.org certs (among others) |
7 |
> > without providing it as a choice. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Despite all the political views that we can throw in favour of a "cacert.org |
10 |
> > are trying to make the SSL certs world less evil" argument this is some major |
11 |
> > policy that we are supporting and it shouldn't be taken that lightly (I don't |
12 |
> > remember such a major confrontation about this) and I really don't think this |
13 |
> > should be a default policy but rather user's choice. Technically cacert.org |
14 |
> > is not a recognized CA in the "proper" way (and don't point that a proper CA |
15 |
> > is a lame concept and a snake oil thing..this is not the point). |
16 |
> |
17 |
> > [CCing security@g.o because this concerns the team as well imho.] |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > Just my 2 eurocent. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > P.S. |
22 |
> > I know that firefox doesn't trust /etc/ssl/certs by default, dunno about |
23 |
> > konqueror. The point is still relevant though. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag? |
27 |
> If so should it be a 'no*certs' flag or a USE=cacerts ? |
28 |
|
29 |
USE=cacerts sounds the proper course of action to me. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Andrea Barisani <lcars@g.o> .*. |
33 |
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Developer V |
34 |
( ) |
35 |
PGP-Key 0x864C9B9E http://dev.gentoo.org/~lcars/pubkey.asc ( ) |
36 |
0A76 074A 02CD E989 CE7F AC3F DA47 578E 864C 9B9E ^^_^^ |
37 |
"Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" |
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |