| 1 |
On 09/10/17 18:13, Daniel Campbell wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm not looking for political propaganda. What would I gain from it? I |
| 3 |
> don't really have any strong connections here. In fact I'm probably |
| 4 |
> ticking a few people off. I'm calling your practices out for what they |
| 5 |
> are, since nobody else appears willing or able to. It's flat-out |
| 6 |
> dishonest to complain about a mailing list on one site, then |
| 7 |
> deliberately add flames to the fire less than a day later on the very |
| 8 |
> list you complained about. You are contributing to the very thing you |
| 9 |
> claim to detest. I don't see that as political, because it affects the |
| 10 |
> work that you, I, and other Gentoo devs do. It damages relationships |
| 11 |
> between developers, and if something isn't done about it, Gentoo will |
| 12 |
> continue falling into irrelevance because we can't get our ship to sail |
| 13 |
> smoothly. We all have the ability to improve this, and I gain nothing by |
| 14 |
> writing this e-mail. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
At this point, the question comes down to whether ComRel would sanction |
| 17 |
a sitting Council member and whether it has reached the point at which |
| 18 |
discovering the answer in practical reality is needed, especially |
| 19 |
considering the virtually guaranteed backlash should that answer turn |
| 20 |
out to be negative. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
While I realize that positive reinforcement is generally a more |
| 23 |
effective training methodology, it seems impractical in this case. |
Archives