| 1 |
On Thursday 10 January 2008, Alin Năstac wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > 3. Should Gentoo even continue to support mips? |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > i see dropping keywords as a very last resort. getting a port *back* |
| 6 |
> > into the tree is a *tremendous* amount of work (i went through it and it |
| 7 |
> > was hell), while keeping ~arch alive is a sliver of effort and generally |
| 8 |
> > not a blocker for package maintainers. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> How about arm, s390 and sh arches? If I'm not mistaken, you are the only |
| 11 |
> one taking care of these arches and apparently you loosed interest in |
| 12 |
> maintaining them. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
i'm afraid we differ in opinion quite drastically here. i routinely update |
| 15 |
the arches according to the tree. i do not go through bugzilla though and |
| 16 |
remove my cc's until much later. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
i imagine on KEYWORDREQ, these arches take quite a while, but not for |
| 19 |
STABLEREQ. |
| 20 |
-mike |
Archives