Archives
Archives
| From: | "Alin Năstac" <mrness@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Of Mips and Devs [Was: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January] | ||
| Date: | Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:01:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4785D0BC.8070206@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Of Mips and Devs [Was: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January] by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 | >> 3. Should Gentoo even continue to support mips? |
| 3 | >> |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > i see dropping keywords as a very last resort. getting a port *back* into the |
| 6 | > tree is a *tremendous* amount of work (i went through it and it was hell), |
| 7 | > while keeping ~arch alive is a sliver of effort and generally not a blocker |
| 8 | > for package maintainers. |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | |
| 11 | How about arm, s390 and sh arches? If I'm not mistaken, you are the only |
| 12 | one taking care of these arches and apparently you loosed interest in |
| 13 | maintaining them. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Of Mips and Devs [Was: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January] | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |