Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jerry McBride <mcbrides9@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2004.2 Feature Requests
Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 03:30:51
Message-Id: pb4dm1xqjv.ln2@spinner.my.domain
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] 2004.2 Feature Requests by John Davis
1 John Davis wrote:
2
3 > Hi all -
4 > To start preparing for 2004.2 in July, releng is opening up Feature
5 > Requests that the community would like to see included in 2004.2. The
6 > last day that we are accepting requests is Friday, May 7th at which
7 > point releng will hold a meeting and decide which requests are feasible
8 > for both the alloted time and workload. Thank you for your time and your
9 > requests.
10 >
11 > Cheers,
12 > //zhen
13
14 Move all documentation to html and place it into a directory that apache can
15 disseminate from. Having a central, online, browseable doc tree would be
16 beautiful. Priceless...
17
18 Move away from the filesystem database that portage currently uses to
19 something with a bit more perfomance... mysql, sqlite even postgres... An
20 SQL backend interface would be WONDERFUL.
21
22 Port portage to c or c++. Python sucks in the performance department... If
23 not port to c then atleast start using psyco for a small perf boost...
24 Rebuilding the cache (reading files) after a sync is... terrible... What a
25 kludge...
26
27 Work on eliminating the constant caching of dependencies and other caching
28 processes during boot up... On some of my boxes, these caching periods take
29 longer than it does for KDE to boot to a usable desktop... What a drag on a
30 laptop that I use to display linux with.... It's the first thing that
31 windows advocates point and laugh at... Give me a break and cache the damn
32 things when changes are MADE, not everytime you boot the box...
33
34 We need a better portage tool that easily displays ebuild dependencies...
35 Can epm finally be completed so it offers the same functions for portrage
36 that rpm has for it's own packages?
37
38 Tone down the amount of noise that emerge prints to the screen when using
39 it. I don't need or want to see maybe 99.99% of all the stuff it prints
40 during it operations. All you need is... either "THERE WAS AN ERROR" or
41 "THERE WERE NO ERRORS". That in and of itself would boost performance a
42 lot!... Less console updates, more cpu for the task at hand... Less user
43 confusion...
44
45 PROGRESS BARS...PROGRESS BARS...PROGRESS BARS...PROGRESS BARS...PROGRESS
46 BARS...PROGRESS BARS...PROGRESS BARS...PROGRESS BARS...PROGRESS
47 BARS...PROGRESS BARS...
48
49 Got the point??? :')
50
51 And above all else... make it all available as user options... that way
52 nobody will cry-baby with the changes....
53
54
55 --
56
57 ******************************************************************************
58 Registered Linux User Number 185956
59 http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux
60 Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net
61 Buy an Xbox for $149.00, run linux on it and Microsoft loses $150.00!
62 12:54pm up 11 days, 16:15, 5 users, load average: 2.89, 2.96, 2.91
63
64
65 --
66 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2004.2 Feature Requests Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2004.2 Feature Requests Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2004.2 Feature Requests Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] still missing local use flags "Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-" <msterret@××××.com>