1 |
John Davis wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Hi all - |
4 |
> To start preparing for 2004.2 in July, releng is opening up Feature |
5 |
> Requests that the community would like to see included in 2004.2. The |
6 |
> last day that we are accepting requests is Friday, May 7th at which |
7 |
> point releng will hold a meeting and decide which requests are feasible |
8 |
> for both the alloted time and workload. Thank you for your time and your |
9 |
> requests. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Cheers, |
12 |
> //zhen |
13 |
|
14 |
Move all documentation to html and place it into a directory that apache can |
15 |
disseminate from. Having a central, online, browseable doc tree would be |
16 |
beautiful. Priceless... |
17 |
|
18 |
Move away from the filesystem database that portage currently uses to |
19 |
something with a bit more perfomance... mysql, sqlite even postgres... An |
20 |
SQL backend interface would be WONDERFUL. |
21 |
|
22 |
Port portage to c or c++. Python sucks in the performance department... If |
23 |
not port to c then atleast start using psyco for a small perf boost... |
24 |
Rebuilding the cache (reading files) after a sync is... terrible... What a |
25 |
kludge... |
26 |
|
27 |
Work on eliminating the constant caching of dependencies and other caching |
28 |
processes during boot up... On some of my boxes, these caching periods take |
29 |
longer than it does for KDE to boot to a usable desktop... What a drag on a |
30 |
laptop that I use to display linux with.... It's the first thing that |
31 |
windows advocates point and laugh at... Give me a break and cache the damn |
32 |
things when changes are MADE, not everytime you boot the box... |
33 |
|
34 |
We need a better portage tool that easily displays ebuild dependencies... |
35 |
Can epm finally be completed so it offers the same functions for portrage |
36 |
that rpm has for it's own packages? |
37 |
|
38 |
Tone down the amount of noise that emerge prints to the screen when using |
39 |
it. I don't need or want to see maybe 99.99% of all the stuff it prints |
40 |
during it operations. All you need is... either "THERE WAS AN ERROR" or |
41 |
"THERE WERE NO ERRORS". That in and of itself would boost performance a |
42 |
lot!... Less console updates, more cpu for the task at hand... Less user |
43 |
confusion... |
44 |
|
45 |
PROGRESS BARS...PROGRESS BARS...PROGRESS BARS...PROGRESS BARS...PROGRESS |
46 |
BARS...PROGRESS BARS...PROGRESS BARS...PROGRESS BARS...PROGRESS |
47 |
BARS...PROGRESS BARS... |
48 |
|
49 |
Got the point??? :') |
50 |
|
51 |
And above all else... make it all available as user options... that way |
52 |
nobody will cry-baby with the changes.... |
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
-- |
56 |
|
57 |
****************************************************************************** |
58 |
Registered Linux User Number 185956 |
59 |
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux |
60 |
Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net |
61 |
Buy an Xbox for $149.00, run linux on it and Microsoft loses $150.00! |
62 |
12:54pm up 11 days, 16:15, 5 users, load average: 2.89, 2.96, 2.91 |
63 |
|
64 |
|
65 |
-- |
66 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |