1 |
On 27/05/14 08:34, Micha³ Górny wrote: |
2 |
> Dnia 2014-05-26, o godz. 23:15:34 |
3 |
> Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> napisa³(a): |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> UPower upstream removed sys-power/pm-utils support from 0.99 release |
6 |
>> (currently unkeyworded in tree), as in, from current git master. |
7 |
> Don't worry. Looking at the past, I can guess this is only a temporary |
8 |
> inconvenience. I'm pretty sure upower will be discontinued soon |
9 |
> and replaced with systemd-powerd or something :D. |
10 |
> |
11 |
|
12 |
That's more or less what they already did, they forced eg. |
13 |
xfce4-power-manager upstream |
14 |
to move the deleted pm-utils code from upower directly to the power |
15 |
manager (application) |
16 |
itself, likewise for xfce4-session |
17 |
Which means applications will now need to duplicate the pm-utils related |
18 |
code per application |
19 |
basis |
20 |
So I expect upower to be more or less dead for everything but systemd |
21 |
users, except for |
22 |
those upstreams that will actually follow the Xfce path and do the |
23 |
duplication |
24 |
Yet, still, small portition of the code is still 'generic', so |
25 |
xfce4-power-manager will still need |
26 |
both, upower, even 0.99, and then pm-utils, depending on the version, |
27 |
codepath is selected |
28 |
|
29 |
This was sort of expected, since pm-utils has been abandoned for ~5 |
30 |
years now at upstream, |
31 |
so nobody is maintaining non-systemd related power management tools |
32 |
anymore, and |
33 |
falling back to eg. manual laptop-mode-tools, acpid, etc. usage will be |
34 |
necessary again, |
35 |
it's like going back to 90s for non-systemd users :P |
36 |
|
37 |
- Samuli |