1 |
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:57:01AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On 27/05/14 08:34, Michał Górny wrote: |
4 |
> > Dnia 2014-05-26, o godz. 23:15:34 |
5 |
> > Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> napisał(a): |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> >> UPower upstream removed sys-power/pm-utils support from 0.99 release |
8 |
> >> (currently unkeyworded in tree), as in, from current git master. |
9 |
> > Don't worry. Looking at the past, I can guess this is only a temporary |
10 |
> > inconvenience. I'm pretty sure upower will be discontinued soon |
11 |
> > and replaced with systemd-powerd or something :D. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> |
14 |
> That's more or less what they already did, they forced eg. |
15 |
> xfce4-power-manager upstream |
16 |
> to move the deleted pm-utils code from upower directly to the power |
17 |
> manager (application) |
18 |
> itself, likewise for xfce4-session |
19 |
> Which means applications will now need to duplicate the pm-utils related |
20 |
> code per application |
21 |
> basis |
22 |
> So I expect upower to be more or less dead for everything but systemd |
23 |
> users, except for |
24 |
> those upstreams that will actually follow the Xfce path and do the |
25 |
> duplication |
26 |
> Yet, still, small portition of the code is still 'generic', so |
27 |
> xfce4-power-manager will still need |
28 |
> both, upower, even 0.99, and then pm-utils, depending on the version, |
29 |
> codepath is selected |
30 |
> |
31 |
> This was sort of expected, since pm-utils has been abandoned for ~5 |
32 |
> years now at upstream, |
33 |
> so nobody is maintaining non-systemd related power management tools |
34 |
> anymore, and |
35 |
> falling back to eg. manual laptop-mode-tools, acpid, etc. usage will be |
36 |
> necessary again, |
37 |
> it's like going back to 90s for non-systemd users :P |
38 |
|
39 |
I can't believe I'm reading that from a distro-developer. Basically this |
40 |
entire thread is "systemd is deprecating the existing tools, so let's dump |
41 |
them and half our userbase back to the 90s, isn't that a great thing?" |
42 |
|
43 |
I speak now only so that we don't get told a year later "you had your chance, |
44 |
too late now." So in that light, what packages besides current pm-utils, do |
45 |
people who don't use systemd, need to keep running after the putsch? Do any |
46 |
of them go away as requirements if we don't use *kit? Eg if we don't use |
47 |
udisks and upower already, but do use udev or eudev (likely what we'll switch |
48 |
to given current state of play.) |
49 |
|
50 |
Especially if we don't want to reduplicate a lib across several apps, as you |
51 |
outlined above; somehow it smells. |
52 |
|
53 |
Hope your operation went well, |
54 |
steveL. |
55 |
-- |
56 |
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly, but we're not /that/ friendly ;-) |