Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Democracy: No silver bullet
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:41:38
Message-Id: 44EE8CC0.8090200@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Democracy: No silver bullet by Chris Gianelloni
1 Chris Gianelloni wrote:
2 > On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 14:54 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
3 >> Most of these problems could be solved if we had a council that was far
4 >> less spineless, a council that's prepared to address the *real* issues
5 >> rather than doing nothing, a council that shows leadership and provides
6 >> direction where it's needed without screwing things up where it's not.
7 >
8 > I definitely agree here. What has made me decide to run for the council
9 > is my wish to see things improve before we honestly do start
10 > hemorrhaging developers. We have seen indications that it is coming,
11 > but it hasn't started quite yet. A strong leadership is needed to give
12 > us direction where needed, and also to leave people well enough alone
13 > where it is not needed. I hope that all of the people elected to the
14 > council are capable of doing both, as it really is what Gentoo seems to
15 > need.
16 >
17 > I also would much rather see us return to a system where the merit of
18 > ones work plays a more important role in the voice one has on global
19 > issues. Perhaps the idea of "one man, one vote" simply doesn't work
20 > well amongst a large group of volunteers with vastly differing levels of
21 > involvement. Perhaps more voting is the answer. Truthfully, I do not
22 > know. However, I lean on the side of a strong set of leaders having the
23 > authority to make decisions, with limited voting only to establish the
24 > leaders. After all, if they're voted into office by the majority, then
25 > the majority must want them to represent them, right?
26
27 Yes, yes, yes!
28
29 Thanks,
30 Donnie

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature