1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 14:54 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
3 |
>> Most of these problems could be solved if we had a council that was far |
4 |
>> less spineless, a council that's prepared to address the *real* issues |
5 |
>> rather than doing nothing, a council that shows leadership and provides |
6 |
>> direction where it's needed without screwing things up where it's not. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I definitely agree here. What has made me decide to run for the council |
9 |
> is my wish to see things improve before we honestly do start |
10 |
> hemorrhaging developers. We have seen indications that it is coming, |
11 |
> but it hasn't started quite yet. A strong leadership is needed to give |
12 |
> us direction where needed, and also to leave people well enough alone |
13 |
> where it is not needed. I hope that all of the people elected to the |
14 |
> council are capable of doing both, as it really is what Gentoo seems to |
15 |
> need. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I also would much rather see us return to a system where the merit of |
18 |
> ones work plays a more important role in the voice one has on global |
19 |
> issues. Perhaps the idea of "one man, one vote" simply doesn't work |
20 |
> well amongst a large group of volunteers with vastly differing levels of |
21 |
> involvement. Perhaps more voting is the answer. Truthfully, I do not |
22 |
> know. However, I lean on the side of a strong set of leaders having the |
23 |
> authority to make decisions, with limited voting only to establish the |
24 |
> leaders. After all, if they're voted into office by the majority, then |
25 |
> the majority must want them to represent them, right? |
26 |
|
27 |
Yes, yes, yes! |
28 |
|
29 |
Thanks, |
30 |
Donnie |