| 1 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
> > I second that. Why do we need to make all the work fixing packages |
| 3 |
> > instead of letting upstream do their job? I am not so excited to |
| 4 |
> > fix every package I maintain as it is quite possible to introduce |
| 5 |
> > regressions in the process. Furthermore, I don't understand your first |
| 6 |
> > message. You say that you will provide xml.use_pyxml() function on |
| 7 |
> > python-2.7. Is this code official or you are just patching the official |
| 8 |
> > python releases? |
| 9 |
> > Anyway, as I said, I'd rather wait for upstream to fix their packages |
| 10 |
> > instead of me. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Some upstreams are dead and some packages using PyXML will never be ported by upstreams to use |
| 13 |
> something else than PyXML (e.g. lxml). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Then those packages should get removed from the tree. Do not start |
| 16 |
introducing Gentoo specific hacks to work around the problem. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Mark Loeser |
| 20 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
| 21 |
email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
| 22 |
web - http://www.halcy0n.com |
Archives