| 1 |
On 11/01/2018 08:43, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> I always was under the impression the following order (and explanation) |
| 3 |
> was the case: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> stable -> development -> experimental |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> For this reason, e.g. Prefix profiles are (still) experimental, which |
| 8 |
> means they really shouldn't bother non-Prefix people. Prefix users and |
| 9 |
> developers work on an environment where those profiles are promoted to |
| 10 |
> development ones, such that repoman kicks in for their work. (At least |
| 11 |
> that was the idea.) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I see you (re-)define dev as "developer's playground", and I wonder if |
| 14 |
> in that case it wouldn't be better to introduce a new one instead? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Maybe I'm just one of a few who thinks the order is reversed now. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The stable -> dev -> exp order also feels more natural to me. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I don't have a strong opinion on this though. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Paweł |
Archives