| 1 |
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 3 |
> <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Michael Mol schrieb: |
| 5 |
>>> A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install |
| 6 |
>>> media be replaced with |
| 7 |
>>> pbzip2. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> If I understand correctly, pbzip2 depends on bzip2. So what you are |
| 10 |
>> asking is that pbzip2 is preferred over bzip2 when both are installed, |
| 11 |
>> and that pbzip2 is installed by default? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> pbzip2 uses libbzip2, which I understand bzip2 to also be a wrapper around. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
libbz2 is built and installed by the app-arch/bzip2 package. Thus, |
| 17 |
app-arch/pbzip2 depends on app-arch/bzip2, unless someone rips libbz2 |
| 18 |
out into a separate ebuild. |
Archives