1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 01:24, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
5 |
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 07:17:40AM +0200, Tony Clark wrote: |
6 |
> > On Tuesday 22 July 2003 04.35, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
7 |
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
8 |
> > > Hash: SHA1 |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > i wouldnt suggest trying to downgrade ... i'm pretty sure it'll leave |
11 |
> > > your box usuable (well it'll leave glibc unusable and thats usually |
12 |
> > > your whole box :D) |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > > you can (if you dont mind shelling out $5) buy the binary versions from |
15 |
> > > transgaming ... those work with the newest glibc ... |
16 |
> > > - -mike |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > Don't buy codeweavers wine stuff as it doesn't work with the latest |
19 |
> > version of glibc. I'll be downgrading glibc soon. Built glibc with nptl |
20 |
> > support as someone here said it would work that way but it doesn't here. |
21 |
> > There is also a bug in the glibc ebuild when you enable nptl, which I |
22 |
> > must report. |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > tony |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Downgrading glibc is a bad idea... anything built against the newer |
27 |
> glibc version will break... |
28 |
|
29 |
Hmmm I'm running gcc 3.2.3 and glibc 2.3.2 and codeweavers crossover plugin |
30 |
works fine for me.. of course I had to tweak ~/.crossover/config to contain |
31 |
my latest kernel (2.4.22) in LDAssumeKernel, but after that everything worked |
32 |
flawlessly |
33 |
|
34 |
- --mike |
35 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
36 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
37 |
|
38 |
iD8DBQE/HTpOzK7WDkEewTARAuhrAKCAOEuVafB/m6tJStSW6Vr92iXw8QCfaVPf |
39 |
72FdiIZdDoF25Ga3nuvFwQY= |
40 |
=DdjP |
41 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |