Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Wojcikiewicz <mike@××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:18:37
Message-Id: 200307220921.19041.mike@codecrew.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc by Jon Portnoy
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Tuesday 22 July 2003 01:24, Jon Portnoy wrote:
5 > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 07:17:40AM +0200, Tony Clark wrote:
6 > > On Tuesday 22 July 2003 04.35, Mike Frysinger wrote:
7 > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
8 > > > Hash: SHA1
9 > > >
10 > > > i wouldnt suggest trying to downgrade ... i'm pretty sure it'll leave
11 > > > your box usuable (well it'll leave glibc unusable and thats usually
12 > > > your whole box :D)
13 > > >
14 > > > you can (if you dont mind shelling out $5) buy the binary versions from
15 > > > transgaming ... those work with the newest glibc ...
16 > > > - -mike
17 > >
18 > > Don't buy codeweavers wine stuff as it doesn't work with the latest
19 > > version of glibc. I'll be downgrading glibc soon. Built glibc with nptl
20 > > support as someone here said it would work that way but it doesn't here.
21 > > There is also a bug in the glibc ebuild when you enable nptl, which I
22 > > must report.
23 > >
24 > > tony
25 >
26 > Downgrading glibc is a bad idea... anything built against the newer
27 > glibc version will break...
28
29 Hmmm I'm running gcc 3.2.3 and glibc 2.3.2 and codeweavers crossover plugin
30 works fine for me.. of course I had to tweak ~/.crossover/config to contain
31 my latest kernel (2.4.22) in LDAssumeKernel, but after that everything worked
32 flawlessly
33
34 - --mike
35 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
36 Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
37
38 iD8DBQE/HTpOzK7WDkEewTARAuhrAKCAOEuVafB/m6tJStSW6Vr92iXw8QCfaVPf
39 72FdiIZdDoF25Ga3nuvFwQY=
40 =DdjP
41 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
42
43
44 --
45 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex and glibc Tony Clark <tclark@×××××.com>