Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] A more natural (human-friendly) syntax for dependencies
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 09:07:06
Message-Id: 20573.32605.626573.294058@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] A more natural (human-friendly) syntax for dependencies by "Michał Górny"
1 >>>>> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, Micha³ Górny wrote:
2
3 >> What is currently not allowed are package names ending with a hyphen
4 >> followed by digits only (as in your above example). This seems to be
5 >> completely arbitrary, and we could remove this limitation, even with
6 >> existing dependency syntax.
7
8 > I doubt we can.
9
10 Nobody could tell me a technical reason why this limitation exists.
11 Why should "foo-1" be forbidden for PN if "foo-1a" is allowed?
12
13 > And we just extended it into repository names, didn't we?
14
15 Indeed, looks like I've missed this. But it shouldn't be a problem, if
16 we loosen the spec for package names, the one for repository names
17 just follows it.
18
19 Ulrich