| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 10/20/2013 05:26 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>> On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 9 |
>>>>> On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote: |
| 10 |
>>>>>>> * not related to the games team * no review whatsoever |
| 11 |
>>>>>>> from any dev on ebuilds that get pushed there |
| 12 |
>>>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>>>> It is easy-fixable. It is enough to gentoo-games team to |
| 14 |
>>>>>> back to work on it together with community. |
| 15 |
>>>>>> |
| 16 |
>>>>>>> * low quality |
| 17 |
>>>>>> low quality of what? ebuilds? I bet, it is many |
| 18 |
>>>>>> lower-quality ebuilds in the tree. Or do you mean low |
| 19 |
>>>>>> quality of something else? Anyway, it is fixable too. |
| 20 |
>>>>>> Just let's start work on it. |
| 21 |
>>>>>> |
| 22 |
>>>>> I agree. |
| 23 |
>>>> |
| 24 |
>>>>> It's better to work with the user community and join |
| 25 |
>>>>> efforts than having yet-another-shiny overlay. |
| 26 |
>>>> |
| 27 |
>>>> |
| 28 |
>>>> Gamerlay is not related to the games team and this thread is |
| 29 |
>>>> not about gamerlay which is a project that has failed. I have |
| 30 |
>>>> zero interest to work on gamerlay. It would have to start |
| 31 |
>>>> with removing direct commit access of users. |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
>>> This is not a great way to invite more users to participate. |
| 34 |
>>> If you intend to make the game overlay and team a |
| 35 |
>>> developer-only thing you are doing a great work. |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
>> |
| 38 |
>> I am not sure if you have read my list of arguments in the first |
| 39 |
>> post. Sunrise is based on that very concept. No user has direct |
| 40 |
>> commit access to the reviewed repository, for good reason (not |
| 41 |
>> sure what you mean with "developer-only"). |
| 42 |
>> |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> I was mainly referring to your way to exluding this community which |
| 45 |
> is already working on the gaming side of Gentoo. You shouldn't |
| 46 |
> ignore active contributors because their ebuilds happen to be of |
| 47 |
> lower quality. |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
Thanks for your opinion on this. It's nice to see that my efforts of |
| 51 |
(unrequested) reviews on bugzilla, overlays, forums and sunrise makes |
| 52 |
you say that I ignore contributors. Especially those contributors who |
| 53 |
respond to or even request reviews (many don't even respond to |
| 54 |
unrequested reviews). |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
Some people from gamerlay have made clear that they are not really |
| 57 |
interested in reviews, yet you want me to waste time on that? |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
I don't think this discussion leads anywhere. |
| 60 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 61 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
| 62 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSY/l+AAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzulQIAKa4qBEE62Zxta3Lv2dB5sHr |
| 65 |
JoBJiOQbX0S2SfmeZSUg4OCkyKzSRyxIXhS+3X86AwkYR/TWcc7a4pwaQvYlUIjz |
| 66 |
YA2HRFY00AWVjNzgYRmwYaggRsJ6TI8iIsNXnWEYkB+TVHrlewwwJn+hNF4ELD25 |
| 67 |
fNsHTxduY8yFiPTgYSKvp84xAC0SVGds4xc5WOITuYngRp5sdq0SELr5JSOjw6tR |
| 68 |
qbrQ79eG4vB+j2ye0zG1BoXtKP2uaP0cSIjPL6OvzXCX4+l27czrp6akHYihFsZz |
| 69 |
+i2JfGN5XGpEi3l6AFVD8VZi0/oUwSR/d6bKoo+crLBhS+29MzFfYuS/Ob7hrfg= |
| 70 |
=3rmu |
| 71 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives