| 1 |
Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> It's offering incentives to get as many commits as possible. The |
| 5 |
>> easiest way to get as many commits as possible is to go on a mass |
| 6 |
>> keywording or stabling spree. It'd be very easy for someone to do a |
| 7 |
>> Manson -- do you really think no-one would? Even if no-one does take it |
| 8 |
>> to that extreme, it's offering a reward for people who commit two things |
| 9 |
>> rather than doing QA and committing on one thing. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> fixing the mess left by others (given we could commit slightly off stuff |
| 12 |
> in 8 hours) is a pretty equivalent way to raise the commits level. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Anyway I'd slow down mirror propagation a bit the first times in order |
| 15 |
> to mitigate the issue pointed by Ciaranm. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> lu |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Though it seemed to me like a fun idea, i also thought the QA of the |
| 21 |
tree could be in danger when i read it. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Luis F. Araujo "araujo at gentoo.org" |
| 27 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives