Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [pre-GLEP] Optional runtime dependencies via runtime-switchable USE flags
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 21:33:45
Message-Id: 4FE392F2.9090306@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [pre-GLEP] Optional runtime dependencies via runtime-switchable USE flags by "Michał Górny"
Michał Górny wrote:
> No, of course not. Otherwise, every package manager run would > practically require it to re-validate all packages in the tree > (possibly not only installed ones). > > Package manager must ensure the flags are valid when package is > in the graph. I would think of IUSE_RUNTIME as a last-step action where > packages were in the graph for rebuild already but the rebuild is > disabled as being unnecessary.
That's what I thought, was just making sure we're on the same page.
> No, the USE flag list in vdb may be updated every time the package gets > into the graph with changed runtime flags. I don't consider that > necessary, however. Just a nice backwards compatibility feature for > other applications looking at vdb.
'K
> Well, as I see it restricting is more of a policy than a technical > requirement.
As long as we're clear on which it is, and what restrictions if any the PM can/should impose...
> But in the current form, the spec doesn't allow passing > IUSE_RUNTIME flags to has_version() so we're on the safe side :P.
True. Do we want to keep it that restrictive?

Replies