| 1 |
Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote: |
| 2 |
> The time I can spend |
| 3 |
> trawling upstream sites for new releases is limited. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Same here - I would never mind getting a 0-day bump request, since |
| 6 |
someone else might have noticed before I did that a new version is |
| 7 |
available. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Just an idea: |
| 10 |
> How about a metadata.xml tag that indicates whether early bump requests are welcome? |
| 11 |
> It's more of an individual developer preference, but that seems the right place for it. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
It might make sense if the default were that 0-day is OK (especially if |
| 14 |
most devs don't mind). If not, then the tag could specifiy the number |
| 15 |
of days to wait... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-Joe |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives