From: | "Tony \\\"Chainsaw\\\" Vroon" <chainsaw@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 0-day bump requests | ||
Date: | Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:26:02 | ||
Message-Id: | 1215127573.4067.7.camel@localhost | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] RFC: 0-day bump requests by Jeroen Roovers |
1 | On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 01:16 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
2 | > 1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request? |
3 | |
4 | If it is for software where I am also upstream (Audacious for example), |
5 | it does tend to annoy me when people try their utmost to file bug |
6 | reports before I commit my ebuild. (I have yet to miss a release by more |
7 | then 6 hours) |
8 | |
9 | > 2) If you had your way, would you discourage users from filing early |
10 | > version bump requests? |
11 | |
12 | For things like the nVidia drivers I do welcome it. The time I can spend |
13 | trawling upstream sites for new releases is limited. |
14 | |
15 | Just an idea: |
16 | How about a metadata.xml tag that indicates whether early bump requests are welcome? |
17 | It's more of an individual developer preference, but that seems the right place for it. |
18 | |
19 | Regards, |
20 | Tony V. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 0-day bump requests | Joe Peterson <lavajoe@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 0-day bump requests | Thomas Anderson <gentoofan23@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 0-day bump requests | Torsten Rehn <scel@××××.org> |
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests | Christian Faulhammer <opfer@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 0-day bump requests | Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 0-day bump requests | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> |