| 1 |
Kumba wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I'm just stating this, because once reiserfs4 goes mainline (I believe |
| 4 |
> it's in -mm currently), we are bound to have users hitting various bumps |
| 5 |
> and ruts in the road using it, and if they file bugs to our bugzilla |
| 6 |
> that aren't related to patches we produce, then they'll likely wind up |
| 7 |
> closed as invalid and such. This saves the users time, and may get them |
| 8 |
> the answers they seek (or at least a resolution of some kind). It also |
| 9 |
> saves our bug-wranglers time by now having to deal with more invalid bugs. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
We can always patch the problem in the g-s ^^ |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Given reiserfs4 is around for enough time and lots of brave users tested |
| 15 |
it, it MAY be not so unstable. (still I like jfs and xfs more, and I use |
| 16 |
them just for transient data (large video and image processing tests and |
| 17 |
so on)) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Luca Barbato |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader |
| 24 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives