| 1 |
On Tuesday 27 December 2005 14:41, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> > On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:54:04AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
> >>Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc |
| 4 |
> >>or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have |
| 5 |
> >>ebuilds die if this is the case. To not break current ebuilds this would |
| 6 |
> >>only happen with FEATURES="stricter". This is what I currently do in my |
| 7 |
> >>bashrc. Obviously when integreted to portage one can use helper |
| 8 |
> >>functions like hasq which are not available in bashrc. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Well some people opposed this idea so what do everyone think about |
| 11 |
> making portage output stuff like this to a qa-warnings (or whatever) |
| 12 |
> file that developers can use? This would have the added benefit that |
| 13 |
> users would not normally see this stuff and report stuff so easily but |
| 14 |
> developers would still have easy access to it. Portage could even output |
| 15 |
> a header to this file saying not to file bug reports unless you know |
| 16 |
> what you are doing? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
if we start "hiding" the output like that then most people will ignore them |
| 19 |
-mike |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives