1 |
On 14-12-2017 14:34:51 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> W dniu czw, 14.12.2017 o godzinie 20∶24 +0700, użytkownik |
3 |
> grozin@g.o napisał: |
4 |
> > If the developers of liblinebreak had not decided to rename their library, |
5 |
> > I could safely bump it from 2.1 to 4.0, in spite of the fact that it is |
6 |
> > maintainer-needed, right? |
7 |
> > Am I personally responsible for their decision to use the new name |
8 |
> > libunibreak? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> No, it wouldn't be fine. We might not even have noticed it if you |
11 |
> at least bothered to update the Manifest. Please stop looking for |
12 |
> excuses and loopholes, and start doing something good for Gentoo. |
13 |
|
14 |
So, breaking the tree, just because someone forgot to set the |
15 |
maintainer field is doing something good for Gentoo? (That's called QA?) |
16 |
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-commits/message/7f34111f0e45f451d5b3a5a58b057d51 |
17 |
|
18 |
Thanks, |
19 |
Fabian |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Fabian Groffen |
23 |
Gentoo on a different level |