| 1 |
W dniu czw, 14.12.2017 o godzinie 14∶38 +0100, użytkownik Fabian Groffen |
| 2 |
napisał: |
| 3 |
> On 14-12-2017 14:34:51 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 4 |
> > W dniu czw, 14.12.2017 o godzinie 20∶24 +0700, użytkownik |
| 5 |
> > grozin@g.o napisał: |
| 6 |
> > > If the developers of liblinebreak had not decided to rename their library, |
| 7 |
> > > I could safely bump it from 2.1 to 4.0, in spite of the fact that it is |
| 8 |
> > > maintainer-needed, right? |
| 9 |
> > > Am I personally responsible for their decision to use the new name |
| 10 |
> > > libunibreak? |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > No, it wouldn't be fine. We might not even have noticed it if you |
| 13 |
> > at least bothered to update the Manifest. Please stop looking for |
| 14 |
> > excuses and loopholes, and start doing something good for Gentoo. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> So, breaking the tree, just because someone forgot to set the |
| 17 |
> maintainer field is doing something good for Gentoo? (That's called QA?) |
| 18 |
> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-commits/message/7f34111f0e45f451d5b3a5a58b057d51 |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Bull-shit. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Breaking the dependency tree was a *honest* mistake on the person who |
| 24 |
reverted this commit. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Andrey pretty clearly stated that he did this *on purpose*. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Best regards, |
| 30 |
Michał Górny |
Archives