1 |
On Monday 20 October 2003 04:34, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> This means that if a user emerges xfree when linked to a 2.4 kernel, |
3 |
> that user will need to remerge xfree after moving to 2.6 kernels. This |
4 |
> takes about 40 minutes on a ~2GHz x86. |
5 |
|
6 |
Well 40 minutes on 2GHz ist a lot more time on a 1GHz system. I recently built |
7 |
gentoo on my laptop (1.1GHz) and it took more than 12 hours for (not all of) |
8 |
kde. With X and gcc and whatnot it would have been quite more. Of course |
9 |
every package only adds an hour or two but it still sums up. I merged gtk+ |
10 |
with -O just to avoid upgrading to xfree-4.3.0-r3 and even that took quite |
11 |
some time. |
12 |
|
13 |
> 1) Is this acceptable? |
14 |
> 2) If not, what is a better solution? Dropping the patch entirely? Note |
15 |
> that I don't know Mesa/programming well enough to write a patch |
16 |
> compatible for both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels. |
17 |
|
18 |
At least don't put the reason for this into a postinst notice. I'd hate to |
19 |
merge a new xfree, just to see a notice (after hours of compiling) about |
20 |
breakage. If you break something, tell me _before_ I merge the package. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
Alex |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |